“Noppadol” is confident that Pheu Thai will move forward and propose “Srettha” to the council for approval.

Parliament, Aug. 9 – "Noppadon" is confident that "Pheu Thai" will continue to propose "Seththa" to the parliament for approval. without ethical problems I believe parliamentarians can distinguish.

Noppadon Pattama, Pheu Thai Party MP, said the Pheu Thai Party would continue to nominate Mr Srettha Thavisin as its prime ministerial candidate. Let the parliament continue to approve because there is no ethical issue Allegations of tax evasion conspiracy are completely untrue, as

1.December 2018, 12 sellers acquire ownership from different companies (imports), which announced the 43rd year of the Revenue Department, indicating that if there is a sale, the income of each person must be paid separately.

2.Separate ownership is the seller's tax planning. That happened in December 2018, completed before the sale to Sansiri in August 2019, which Sansiri was not involved or colluded in any suspicious act.

3. Transfer of land ownership of the seller to Sansiri (buyer) in August 2019 (outbound). Still have to pay tax on the land value of each person received. in whose money That person pays taxes. Not related to Sansiri at all

“First-year law students see that it is the seller's tax planning that occurs before the sale to Sansiri. And not involved in any way with the buyer, namely Sansiri or Mr. Srettha. The facts and laws are clear that Mr. Srettha is not illegal or violates any ethics at all. Trying to portray this matter as a political matter has crossed the line greatly, causing Mr. Srettha to lose his reputation, although he has nothing to do with it. In matters that are not illegal from the beginning At the time when the Pheu Thai Party would nominate the name to the parliament for approval. It's unfair and wrong. It's a challenge to the rule of law. and conscience of the accuser Please stop creating artificial ethical standards. I believe that parliamentarians have the knowledge to distinguish whether the allegations are grounded or not.”

As for the case where Mr. Srettha Thavisin sent a lawyer to sue Mr. Chuvit, Mr. Noppadon stated that it was to protect his own rights. shows that he still fights did not silence Mr. Chuvit in any way.-Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency